Volume 3 Issue 3 | 2026 | View PDF
Paper Id: IJMSM-V3I3P112
doi: 10.71141/30485037/V3I3P112

Evaluation of Road Condition Using the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Method in West Ring Road, Kepanjen District, Malang Regency

Fernando Diotara Mahardika, Henri Siswanto, Pranoto

Citation:
Fernando Diotara Mahardika, Henri Siswanto, Pranoto, "Evaluation of Road Condition Using the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Method in West Ring Road, Kepanjen District, Malang Regency" International Journal of Multidisciplinary on Science and Management, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 130-136, 2026.

Abstract:
High traffic on the highway will gradually degrade its quality before it reaches its service life. Pavement deterioration results in damage to the road surface as well as structural damage. Road damage leads to a decrease in the level of traffic safety, comfort and security. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze road damage to determine the appropriate type of handling. The purpose of this study is to describe the level of road damage based on the PCI method on the West Ring Road and determine the type of handling or maintenance from the PCI method on the West Ring Road section. Analysis using the PCI method is carried out based on the Guidelines for Determining the Pavement Condition Index (IKP) Pd 01-2016-B. The data used in this study are primary data obtained through field surveys and secondary data in the form of road section data obtained from the PUPR Office of Malang Regency. From this study, it was obtained that the level of road damage on the West Ring Road section of Kepanjen District from Malang to Blitar using the PCI method was moderate with a PCI value of 56,88. The type of handling or maintenance based on the PCI method is structural improvement.

Keywords: Pavement Condition Index, Road Deterioration, Road Maintenance.

References:
1. M. Rondi, “Evaluasi Perkerasan Jalan Menurut Metode Bina Marga Dan Metode PCI (Pavement Condition Index) Serta Alternatif Penangananya,” Ilmiah, Publikasi, vol. 3, no. 20, pp. 1–19, 2016.
2. N.A. Munggarani, and A. Wibowo, “Kajian Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Kerusakan Dini Perkerasan Jalan Lentur Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Biaya Penanganan,” Jurnal Infrastruktur, vol. 3, no. 01, pp. 9–18, 2017.
3. Badan Pusat Statistik, “Statistik Transportasi Darat 2019,” Badan Pusat Statistik, 06140.2002, 2020.
4. Kementerian PUPR, “Informasi Statistik Infrastruktur PUPR 2020,” Pusdatin, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1–58, 2020.
5. L. Susantio, “Pemilihan Metode Penilaian Kondisi Jalan Yang Mendekati Perkiraan Kondisi Jalan Saat Pemeliharaan,” 2015.
6. I. Setiadi, and A. Setyawan, “Evaluasi Nilai Kondisi Perkerasan Jalan Nasional Dengan Metode Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Dan Metode Benkelman Beam (BB) (Studi Kasus: Ruas Jalan Pakem-Prambanan),” vol. d, p. 1265, 2017.
7. Mardianus, “Studi Penanganan Jalan Berdasarkan Tingkat Kerusakan Perkerasan Jalan (Studi Kasus Jalan Kuala Dua Kabupaten Kubu Raya),” Jurnal Teknik Sipil Untan, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 12, 2013.
8. D. Ray, “Jaringan Jalan Daerah Yang Rusak Di Indonesia; Antara Peluang Dan Tantangan,” Jurnal Prakarsa Infrastruktur Indonesia, vol. 14, no. 21, pp. 1–47, 2013.
9. H. Siswanto, et al., “Sistem Manajemen Jalan Dan Kondisi Kerusakan Jalan Di Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian Pustaka,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Prasarana Wilayah IX, pp. 51–58, 2016.
10. R. Yahya, et al., “Analisis Kerusakan Jalan Menggunakan Metode Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Dan Surface Distress Indek (SDI),” Conference on Innovation and Application of Science and Technology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 355–362, 2019.
11. V. Novitasari, and D. Iskandar, “Pengaruh Kondisi Drainase Terhadap Kerusakan Perkerasan Jalan Lentur Dengan Metode Pavement Condition Index (PCI),” Tapak, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 18–25, 2017.
12. F.M.A. Karim, K.A.H. Rubasi, and A.A. Saleh, “The Road Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Evaluation and Maintenance: A Case Study of Yemen,” Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1446–1455, 2016.
13. R.B.A. Affandhie, “Perencanaan Jalan Lingkar Barat Kepanjen STA 0+000 – 4+232 Kabupaten Malang Dengan Menggunakan Perkerasan Lentur,” Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya, 2012.
14. P.A. Safitra, et al., “Analisa Pengaruh Beban Berlebih Terhadap Umur Rencana Jalan (Studi Kasus: Ruas Jalan Manado - Bitung),” Jurnal Sipil Statik, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 319–328, 2019.
15. K. Rijal, “Survei Kondisi Perkerasan Jalan (Studi Kasus Ruas Jalan Yos Sudarso Kota Mataram),” Program Studi Teknik Sipil Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, vol. 6, pp. 39–41, 2020.
16. Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga, “Surat Edaran Dirjen Tentang Panduan Pelaksanaan Survei Kondisi Jalan Dan Jembatan Tahun Anggaran 2021,” 2021.
17. H. Mubarak, “Analisa Tingkat Kerusakan Perkerasan Jalan Dengan Metode Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Studi Kasus: Jalan Soekarno Hatta Sta. 11+150 Analisis Tingkat Kerusakan Perkerasan Jalan,” Fakultas Teknik Universitas Abdurrab, vol. 16, pp. 94–109, 2016.
18. S. Djalante, “Evaluasi Kondisi Dan Kerusakan Perkerasan Lentur Di Beberapa Ruas Jalan Kota Kendari,” Mektek, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2010.
19. I.M. Udiana, A. Saudale, and J.J. Pah, “Analisa Faktor Penyebab Kerusakan Jalan (Studi Kasus Ruas Jalan W.J. Lalamentik Dan Ruas Jalan Gor Flobamora),” Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 2014.
20. M.Y. Shahin, Pavement Management for Airports, Roads, and Parking Lots, Chapman & Hall, New York, p. 568, 1994.
21. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat, “Penentuan Indeks Kondisi Perkerasan (IKP),” SE Menteri PUPR, pp. i–79, 2016.
22. Y. Ramli, M. Isya, and S.M. Saleh, “Evaluasi Kondisi Perkerasan Jalan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Pavement Condition Index (PCI) (Studi Kasus Ruas Jalan Beureunuen – Batas Keumala),” Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 761–768, 2018.
23. F. Chasanah, and D.A. Wijaya, “Kerusakan Perkerasan Lentur Dengan Metode Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Untuk Menentukan Prioritas Penanganan Pada Jalan Solo-Yogyakarta Km 43,8 - 44,8,” Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium FSTPT, Islamic University of Indonesia, pp. 11–13, 2016.