Volume 3 Issue 2 | 2026 | View PDF
Paper Id:IJMSM-V3I2P107
doi: 10.71141/30485037/V3I2P107

The Planner and Society - Regulation or Inclusivity, Co-creation or Isolation: A Comparative Case Analysis

Dr. Eugenio Ferrer Santiago III, EnP

Citation:
Dr. Eugenio Ferrer Santiago III, EnP, "The Planner and Society - Regulation or Inclusivity, Co-creation or Isolation: A Comparative Case Analysis" International Journal of Multidisciplinary on Science and Management, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 62-72, 2026.

Abstract:
Professional planning credentials occupy a debated subject matter between state authority, market forces, and civil society. This article addresses that gap through a comparative case study of licensing and certification frameworks for urban and regional planners in seven jurisdictions: Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Hong Kong (Special Administrative Region), the United Arab Emirates, the Philippines, and Singapore. Drawing exclusively on peer-reviewed academic literature, official policy instruments, and legislative texts, the study examines whether professional regulation strengthens or subverts the public interest mandate of the planning profession. Findings are synthesized through a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) matrix and organized along five thematic axes: the primacy of public interest as a professional obligation; ASEAN regional credential harmonization; the tensions between multidisciplinary practice and mono-disciplinary credentialism; the exclusionary dimensions of professional closure; and the regulatory and capacity challenges confronting environmental planning in the Philippines under Republic Act No. 10587 (RA 10587). The article argues that professional credentials are necessary but not sufficient instruments of public interest planning: institutional environments must actively enable, rather than merely permit, planners to serve communities. It concludes with targeted recommendations for specialization board/s development; Philippine Professional Qualifications Framework (PPQF) alignment; and capacity-building strategies applicable to jurisdictions where the planning profession remains developing and changing to respond the call of the times.

Keywords: Credentialism, Environmental Planning, Professional Licensing, Urban Planning.

References:
1. K. Alawadi, and S. Dooling, “Challenges and Opportunities for Participatory Planning Approaches Within Dubai's Urban Context,” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 212–236, 2016.
2. J. Barry, and C. Legacy, “Between Virtue and Profession: Theorizing the Rise of Professionalized Public Participation Practitioners,” Planning Theory & Practice, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2023.
3. Canadian Institute of Planners, Membership Eligibility, 2024.
4. B. Clifford, et al., The Future for Planners: Commercialization, Professionalism and the Public Interest in the UK, Policy Press, 2024.
5. A. Dawidowicz, A. Klimach, and M.J. Nowak, “A Literature Review on the Paradoxes of Public Interest in Spatial Planning Within Urban Settings With Diverse Stakeholders,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 9, p. 3608, 2024.
6. Department of Budget and Management, Budget Circular No. 2022-2: Index of Occupational Services, Occupational Groups, Classes and Salary Grades, CY 2022 Edition, 2022. Online: https://www.dbm.gov.ph/index.php/2023/budget-of-expenditures-and-sources-of-financing-fy-2023?view=article&id=174&catid=28
7. Emirates Planning Association, Professional Certification, 2024.
8. Hong Kong Institute of Planners, Introducing HKIP, 2024.
9. E. Howe, “Professional Roles and the Public Interest in Planning,” Journal of Planning Literature, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 230–248, 1992.
10. HKU Faculty of Architecture, Master of Science in Urban Planning, University of Hong Kong, 2024. Online: https://www.arch.hku.hk/programmes/upad/master-of-science-in-urban-planning/
11. M.S. Larson, The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis, University of California Press, 1977.
12. C.K. Leung, “Collaborative Planning in an Undemocratic Setting: What Can We Learn From a Short-Lived Experiment in Hong Kong?,” Planning Theory & Practice, Advance online publication, 2025.
13. M.K. Ng, “From Government to Governance? Politics of Planning in the First Decade of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region,” Planning Theory & Practice, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 165–185, 2008.
14. Planning Accreditation Board, Promoting Excellence in Academic Planning Programs, 2024. Online: https://www.planningaccreditationboard.org/
15. Professional Regulation Commission, PRC Reinforces the Compliance of RA No. 10587, 2015. Online: https://prc.gov.ph/article/prc-reinforces-compliance-ra-no-10587-law-professional-practice-environmental-planning/2452
16. R.M. Rehan, “Rethinking Dubai's Urbanism: Generating Sustainable Form-Based Urban Design Strategies for an Integrated Neighborhood,” Cities, vol. 55, pp. 77–95, 2016.
17. Republic of the Philippines, Republic Act No. 10587: An Act Regulating the Practice of Environmental Planning, Official Gazette, 2013. Online: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2013/ra_10587_2013.html
18. Royal Town Planning Institute, Routes to Chartered Membership, 2024. Online: https://www.rtpi.org.uk/membership/join-us/membership-classes/chartered-planner/
19. M. Tait, “Trust and the Public Interest in the Micropolitics of Planning Practice,” Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 157–171, 2011.
20. United Nations Human Settlements Programme, ASEAN Sustainable Urbanization Report, 2022. Online: https://unhabitat.org/asean-sustainable-urbanisation-report
21. University of the Philippines Centre for Integrative and Development Studies, The State of Environmental Planning Education in the Philippines After RA No. 10587, 2025. Publisher Link
22. R.K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed., SAGE Publications, 2018.
23. B. Yuen, “Guiding Spatial Changes: Singapore Urban Planning,” in S.V. Lall, M. Freire, B. Yuen, R. Rajack, and J.-J. Helluin (Eds.), Urban Land Markets, Springer, pp. 289–307, 2009.