Volume 3 Issue 2 | 2026 | View PDF
Paper Id:IJMSM-V3I2P104
doi: 10.71141/30485037/V3I2P104
Enhancing Students' Electronics Skills: Developing an Integrated Lecture-Hands-On Guidebook for Blended Learning Modalities
Aina G. Nepomuceno, Irish S. Pascual, Patrick Louie F. Barrera, Reygei R. Villatura, Daisylene G. Ocsan, Joseline M. Santos
Citation:
Aina G. Nepomuceno, Irish S. Pascual, Patrick Louie F. Barrera, Reygei R. Villatura, Daisylene G. Ocsan, Joseline M. Santos, "Enhancing Students' Electronics Skills: Developing an Integrated Lecture-Hands-On Guidebook for Blended Learning Modalities" International Journal of Multidisciplinary on Science and Management, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 23-31, 2026.
Abstract:
This study aimed to develop an Integrated Lecture–Hands-On Guidebook in Electronics for Grade 7 Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE) under Industrial Arts, designed for blended learning environments. The guidebook was aligned with the Department of Education’s Learning Resources Management and Development System (LRMDS) to address the need for structured instructional materials suitable for both face-to-face and online modalities. A quantitative descriptive–developmental research design was employed, involving 57 respondents: 40 Grade 7 students for baseline skills assessment, 5 electronics experts for guidebook validation, and 12 TLE teachers to evaluate its level of acceptability using adapted and validated survey instruments. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, specifically the weighted mean and standard deviation. Results revealed that students demonstrated consistently low competence across learning modalities, with mean scores of 2.04 (SD = 0.30) in physical settings, 2.04 (SD = 0.33) in online settings, and 2.07 (SD = 0.28) in blended settings. These findings indicate a gap between theoretical knowledge and the application of practical skills. The developed guidebook obtained passing ratings from expert validators, with high scores in content quality (Total = 39) and instructional quality (Total = 39.8), both interpreted as Very Satisfactory. Furthermore, teachers evaluated the material as highly acceptable, with an overall mean of 4.92 (SD = 0.10) for content quality and 4.92 (SD = 0.08) for instructional quality. The study concludes that the integrated lecture–hands-on guidebook is a valid, acceptable, and effective instructional resource that can enhance students’ electronics skills in blended learning environments.
Keywords:
Blended Learning, Electronics, Industrial Arts, Integrated Lecture-Hands-On-Guidebook.
References:
1. UNESCO, Global Education Monitoring Report 2024: Gender Report, UNESCO Digital Library, 2024. Online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391998
2. R.M. Gagné, The Conditions of Learning, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1965.
3. D.A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice-Hall, 1984.
4. R.E. Mayer, Multimedia Learning, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2021.
5. J. Piaget, The Psychology of the Child, Basic Books, 1972.
6. R.M. AlAli, and A.A. Al-Barakat, “Role of Teacher Understanding About Instructional Visual Aids in Developing National and International Student Learning Experiences,” Journal of International Students, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 331–354, 2023.
7. F. Alhashem, and A. Alfailakawi, “Technology-Enhanced Learning Through Virtual Laboratories in Chemistry Education,” Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 15, no. 4, p. ep474, 2023.
8. M.S. Alqahtani, and H. Alyami, “Reflective Thinking and Self-Evaluation in Language Learning,” Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2024.
9. D.B. Anduyan, “Effectiveness of Blended Learning Modules as Correlates of Self-Efficacy of ALS Students,” International Journal of Multidisciplinary, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 1043–1060, 2021.
10. R.M. AlAli, and A.A. Al-Barakat, “Role of Teacher Understanding About Instructional Visual Aids in Developing National and International Student Learning Experiences,” Journal of International Students, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 331–354, 2023.
11. M.A. Ashraf, et al., “Fostering ICT Competencies in Blended Learning: Role of Curriculum Content, Material, and Teaching Strategies,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, p. 758016, 2022.
12. R.A. Avianti, “The Effectiveness of Online Learning Models and Assessment Methods in Improving Learning Competence in the Field of Mechatronics,” Global International Journal of Innovative Research, vol. 2, no. 11, 2024.
13. A.P. Bautista, et al., “School Support Received and the Challenges Encountered in Distance Learning Education by Filipino Teachers,” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 360–385, 2021.
14. F. Alhashem, and A. Alfailakawi, “Technology-Enhanced Learning Through Virtual Laboratories in Chemistry Education,” Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 15, no. 4, p. ep474, 2023.
15. R.S. Cagomoc, “Effectiveness and Acceptability of Textbook Instruction Paired with Locally-Developed Quality-Assured MELC-Based Learning Activity Sheets,” International Journal of Scientific Research Updates, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 21–26, 2022.
16. J. Calabrese, “A Pilot Study to Compare Lecture and Active Learning,” Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, vol. 7, no. 2, 2023.
17. J.A.R. Calatrava, “Development and Evaluation of E-Learning Materials with Kotobee Application in Physical Science,” International Journal of Multidisciplinary, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 1913–1920, 2022.
18. C.S.F. Camuyong, “Development, Validation and Effectiveness of Instructor-Made Learning Course Material (LCM),” International Journal of Multidisciplinary, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 439–445, 2023.
19. W. Cao, “A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Blended Learning on Performance, Attitude, Achievement, and Engagement,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, 2023.
20. E.M. Chweu, “A Framework for Discipline-Specific Learning, Teaching, and Assessment of Psychomotor Skills in Higher Education,” International Journal of Higher Education Issues, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2025.
21. M.O. Olowe, “Vocational and Technical Education: A Functional Education for Sustainable Development in a Global Turbulent Era,” International Journal of Vocational and Technical Education Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2024.
22. P.R.R. De, et al., “Development and Validation of Micro-Lecture Videos as Learning Support Material,” International Journal of Multidisciplinary, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 594–604, 2024.
23. J.P.C. Demapendan, E.A.T. Aquino, and G.P. Hilario, “Technology and Livelihood Education Learning Brochures for Grade 7 Students,” Journal of Evaluation in Education, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 177–189, 2024.
24. S. Disa, and S. Arni, “Gamification Enhanced Micro Learning in Blended Learning: Effects on Knowledge and Skills,” Inspiration, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 66–77, 2025.
25. A. Dzaiy, et al., “The Use of Active Learning Strategies to Foster Effective Teaching in Higher Education Institutions,” Zanco Journal of Humanity Sciences, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 140–157, 2024.
26. C. Forde, et al., “Comparing Face-to-Face, Blended and Online Teaching Approaches for Practical Skill Acquisition,” Medical Science Educator, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 627–637, 2024.
27. M.D. Gaña, “Development and Validation of InfoSIM for Grade 1 Mathematics Instruction,” International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 85–98, 2022.
28. R. Marciniak, and C. Cáliz Rivera, “A System of Indicators for the Quality Assessment of Didactic Materials in Online Education,” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 22, no. 1, 2021.
29. D. Deepthi, and S. Exley, “Exploring Students' Experiences of Technical and Vocational Learning in University Technical Colleges During the Pandemic,” British Educational Research Journal, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 575–592, 2023.
30. M. Cleveland-Innes, and D. Wilton, About the Guidebook, Blended Learning Practice MOOC, Commonwealth of Learning & Athabasca University.
31. J. Cozo, TLE-G7-G8-EPAS_ADM-Module, Scribd. Online: https://www.scribd.com/document/537752301/TLE-G7-G8-EPAS-ADM-Module#google_vignette
32. S. Bekele, “Influence of Content Evaluation Criteria on Quality of Business Studies Core Textbook in Secondary Schools in Kenya,” Master’s Thesis, University of Nairobi, International Journal of Education Technology and Learning, 2022.
33. Department of Education, Guidelines in the Selection of Textbooks and Teacher’s Manuals, DepEd Order No. 008, s. 2025, 2025. Online: https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DO_s2025_008.pdf
34. Department of Education, Guidelines on the Implementation of the Joint Delivery Voucher Program for Senior High School Technical-Vocational-Livelihood Specializations for School Year 2017–2018, DepEd Order No. 68, s. 2017, DepEd, Pasig City, 2017. Online: https://www.deped.gov.ph/2017/12/28/do-68-s-2017-guidelines-on-the-implementation-of-the-joint-delivery-voucher-program-for-senior-high-school-technical-vocational-livelihood-specializations-for-school-year-2017-2018/
35. Department of Education, Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan in the Time of COVID-19, Enclosure to DepEd Order No. 012, s. 2020, DepEd, Pasig City, 2020. Online: https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/DO_s2020_012.pdf
36. Department of Education, Learning Resources Management and Development System (LRMDS) Portal, DepEd Tambayan, 2021. Online: https://depedtambayan.net/lrmds-portal/#google_vignette
37. M.J. Gumasing, et al., “Tri-X Modality Continuance: A Digital Learning Innovation in the Philippines,” Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, University of San Jose-Recoletos, 2025.
38. U. Rahmi, A. Azrul, and R.D. Mahande, “The Prototype of Blended Learning’s Support System to Improve the Pre-Service Teacher’s Digital Literacy,” Journal of Educators Online, vol. 19, no. 3, 2025.
39. I. Hristov, et al., “Constructive Alignment: Learning Outcomes, Teaching Activities, and Assessment,” Journal of Agriculture and Plant Sciences, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 21–34, 2023.
40. M.L. Nobis Jr., R.S. Ballado, and C.B. Froilan, “Blended Learning in Higher Education: Unveiling Student Experiences, Challenges, and Opportunities for Policy Development,” Science and Engineering Journal, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 274–285, 2024.